..But this version, the academic Oxford Uni Press version , not the fake ones with an agenda. There are many. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Life-Muhammad-I-Ishaq/dp/0196360331/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1504702010&sr=8-1&keywords=the+life+of+muhammad+guillaume …
-
-
I'll send my first tweet again: If you both agree with that text, fantastic https://twitter.com/jamesbayswater/status/905788990372110336 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
I agree with that. We were talking abt the points raised in Gurwinder's piece. Please go away if you don't know how to have a conversation.
-
Not a single one of my points in my text has been addressed, which suggests something, doesn't it?

-
That's because no-one disagrees with it. Do you really want me to go through & say yes to it all? Can't I just say yes?
-
But Gurwinder's piece is looking at how Islam is practiced, how people are thinking, what underlies it & how it comes together.
-
That is what I suggested you addressed. Why you think this means we need telling about the basic problems of Islam, I don't know.
-
I picked one premise in the first para which I believe is fundamentally wrong. I explained in detail why I believe it is wrong.
-
No, you didn't. And in fact you can't. The bible & its prophets are violent. You pointed out that Jesus wasn't and no-one disagreed.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.