Sorry, i meant to say 2 incomes. I agree with equal rights but feminism has removed the opportunity for mums to be mums.
That was an old radfem thing. Intersectionals don't care about it & they have dominated for some time now.
-
-
Dunno if the author is a radfem or intersectional, but seems recent enough to outright call it outdatedhttp://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/03/22/columnist-it-should-be-illegal-to-be-a-stay-at-home-mom/ …
-
It isn't an intersectional argument. Also not very common. That zeitgeist has passed. Women working is mainstream now.
-
It is. Being a stay at home mom also is. But some don't like it and are trying to make it socially inadequate, even today.
-
As a disclaimer, I'm of your opinion that to each, it's own.
-
Also, stay at home moms who don't work is pretty much an impossibility in lower and middle class around here
-
If you want a good lifestyle, yes. We cld live on my husband's income as fork-lift driver but wld have to move out of London ...
-
...get small place, be very economical, not have holidays or much in the way of consumer goods. Could eat & clothe ourselves tho.
-
Here, our middle class is a bit less well off, methinks
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Either way, I'm not disputing if it's a majority, minority, only that such a position exists
-
*only stating that such a position exists
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.