And do so antagonistically. I'm only going to warn them once & then block them now. Keep to the topic, Be concise. Be civil & open.
-
-
-
I call this kind of person the 'serial monologue inflictor' - they have one issue & they find a way to shoehorn it in everywhere at length.
-
They always know huge amounts abt this one perspective on this one topic & blanket posts with essay-length comments & dozens of sources.
-
Detailed explanations and sources are great in most cases but not when it's irrelevant & no-one is interested & you've been asked to stop.
-
Anyway, apparently if I co-write a thing defending the values of modernity, it means I must hear utter crap abt Richard Dawkins & Sam Harris
-
A biologist who describes the body as a machine for self-replicating coded information must think humans worthless & everything known.
-
And if I don't want to hear this irrelevant & deeply stupid drivel, it must mean I am admitting defeat and running away.
-
Before that, I had a gender critical radfem who must make everything abt the definition of 'woman' tho that wasn't remotely relevant either
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Twunt? Twit and c*** ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.