You clearly have a very different view of the word "acceptable" than I do. Although they should be allowed to say it, it is unacceptable.
-
-
Semantics then. Either you accept the right to such views or you don't.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It didn't ask whether their right to speak them was acceptable. It asked whether the view itself was acceptable.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
A view is something that's expressed. I'd be more concerned if ppl accepted actions.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I feel like you are ignoring a very real and rising threat to confirm a bias toward notions of respectability.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @apeirophobic @HPluckrose and
A question: how far do fascists have to rise before you accept a reponsibility to violently oppose them?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
To violence. Ideas need to be countered with ideas to defeat them. Or you just drive them underground.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
So until the moment before they initiate the gas chambers. AKA: when you have no hope of opposing them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @apeirophobic
Will u keep trying to defeat bad ideas w violence until that stage or will you accept this doesn't work in time to prevent it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
You are committing an equivocation fallacy grouping all bad ideas together. Slavery and UFO conspiracies do not belong in the same category.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
What? No, I'm not. I'm pointing out we both take our position coz we think it will prevent escalation best.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.