Crenshaw gave a talk about the corruption of the definition of intersectionality recently, and you've reminded me to go look for it.
-
-
Replying to @Geordie_in_VA @tjaffry
I saw it. But the foundational essays were pretty bad.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @tjaffry
I haven't read them, but I understand the basic ideas. When I hear how awful intersectionality is I wonder what definition is being used 1/-
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I've spent 2yrs reading about the intersection between class & race in the US. So am I supposed to give up? Ignore it? 2/3
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Geordie_in_VA @tjaffry
That's up to you. Sunk-cost fallacy isn't a good reason to keep using it but that doesn't mean there isn't one.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @tjaffry
There is a good reason. Data. But before we get to discussing that it's rejected by many because intersectional. Which is bad.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @tjaffry
I'm not saying it is. It's data. I get a different picture if I look at general employment data vs race specific data for example.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Geordie_in_VA @tjaffry
OK, well that's evidence then. Don't need critical theory for that. I'm not sure where this is going but I need to go to bed. :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @tjaffry
My point is there's an issue. What caused it? How do we address it? Before we even get to that we're met with resistance.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
OK but I'm not sure I disagree with this point or what it relates to. And I really need to go to bed.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.