Also, nobody says 'reverse racism' except the people claiming it doesn't exist. People who think it does just say 'racism.' https://twitter.com/OmanReagan/status/900492492281217024 …
It is that but there is a stubborn refusal to accept that the conventional meaning exists & just tell people they don't know what it means.
-
-
Right, but there's also a sociological definition which people are using to differentiate between two unequal things.
-
Yes & they insist that that's the only one that exists rather than saying 'I'm using the word to mean "systemic racism"' 1/2
-
Also, they do this when the person who has said something is racist is clearly not talking abt that but abt prejudice on grounds of race.
-
That's kind did my point. Both sides (willfully?) ignorant that the other is using a different definition. So we get nowhere.
-
But we can. It's so easy to say what you mean and accept other definitions exist. I'm saying we should do that.
-
We can, yes. Wherever we do or not is another matter.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
