Glad you address what postmodernism gets right, more fair than what seems to be @RichardDawkins' outright rejection of #postmodernism.https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/900421397545197568 …
If you use knowledge to mean 'subjective interpretation' of course it will include subjective interpretation. It's not what's at issue here
-
-
Not for you, but I get a sense of where you are coming from. Appreciate the discussion.
-
No-one is attacking subjective interpretations or saying they shld be banned! Saying they shouldn't be claimed to be true!
-
Objectively true? That's a straw man. Who is making such claims?
-
Oh for goodness sake. I can't explain this in tweets if you really don't understand. Got company. I'll get back to you,
-
You said subjective views "shouldn't be claimed to be true." I say that's a straw man. If you show me who said that, I'll also dispute.
-
You are spectacularly missing the point. They assert things like 'sexual jealousy arose as a result of a crisis of masculinity in 17th C'
-
It's not that we are attacking subjective claims. We are challenging belief that subjective experiences are more valid than data.
-
More valid in an objectively verifiable sense? No, subjective claims are not.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.