People are pointing out to me that JW's brand of feminism is exactly the kind that views this behaviour as sexist patriarchal exploitation
-
-
-
And, if so, engaging in it whilst promoting that brand would be blatant hypocrisy. Which is a good point.
-
But what’s worse: hypocritically doing good while also doing bad; or non-hypocritically not doing good at all?
-
I see why it would be the former but also see why people would object to the hypocrisy. Also, in this case, his good isn't good.
-
He engaged quite aggressively with Gamergate which was based on a blog post essientially mirroring JW's wife's tell-all expose...
-
Did he? Hmmm. Have to admit I am low on sympathy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.