Yeah. The argument re: history, is at best an argument against destroying such statues, not one for displaying them in prominent places.https://twitter.com/buffsoldier_96/status/897428410087223296 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Time brings a certain neutrality to history which cannot be expected to exist whilst its effects are still being felt.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
We can have public attractions like The London Dungeons featuring The Inquisition because that danger is long gone.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
We can see it as reminder of the danger of theocracy or any ideological enforcement & of man's inhumanity to man.But specific source is gone
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Mostly people wander around it and get a pleasurable thrill of horror. Because they are safe from it. The Inquisition is not coming back.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Unthinkable to have an 'attraction' for the holocaust. Its impact is still felt by individuals & in sickening antisemitic rhetoric.
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
History needs to take a different tactic here. A different attitude is needed. The artifacts & records need to be displayed differently.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
These are displayed as a museum. There's also not the humour aspect. It's very much solemn and depressing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.