False equivalence. The right killed 3 people today
-
-
Shouldn't we be honest?
-
You can't be 'honest' about what someone else meant. You can either read them charitable or uncharitably. I'm not going to argue about it.
-
He created parallel constructions and thus treated them as equivalent. No real argument to be had.
-
Except that its led you to conclude that James thinks firing someone is the same as murder so you've gone wrong somewhere.
-
Where did I say that?
-
You said they're equally aghast-worthy so James treats them as equivalent. If you don't think he genuinely does, no problem.
-
Actually, I said the parallel constructions treat them as equivalent and equally "aghast" worthy.
-
Maybe you should be more careful how ppl can interpret you then? Or maybe we can just use a little more charity & a little less pedantry.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Helen why do you not see false equivalency here?
-
Because I think you can see more than one problem at a time without thinking them the same.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.