1/ I'm surprised at the elevation of Zunger's piece too. At best, it's an even worse example of the flaws of Damore's memo, as argumentitive
-
-
Maybe, they'd have lost customers if they thought some of their accountants were women. Her persistence was both ethical and brave tho.
-
Absolutely! And now we have anti-discrimination laws to protect this kind of speech. If we want laws protecting men who say women are ...
-
inferior, we elect ppl who enact such laws, and SC upholds, then that will be OK too. Fortunately, we don't. Corps walk tightrope between
-
the legal v corp imperatives. Legal (hopefully) wins, but where there are no laws, corps do as they see fit.
-
Please go away now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.