I didn't get that Damore's point was to "not judge individuals as groups". Seemed the opposite.
It could be dishonesty but its hardly obscure to say 'Differences exist but there's an overlap & treating people as individuals is key.'
-
-
This is the perfectly standard stance of the liberal who has read a bit of evolutionary psychology. See Steven Pinker.pic.twitter.com/iIr45dWlu3
-
Would've thought that fairly obvious and unnecessary.
-
Even after the last few days?!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If this was his point it wouldn't have been controversial. There seems to be some drift toward revision happening now.
-
What?! This is exactly what he said. He even included a diagram showing the overlap & the problem with seeing it as a dichotomy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree. My point is that the *only* potentially valid avenue of "attack" must be whether he is lying or confused. NOT that he didn't say it
-
("avenue of attack" specific to this subpoint, obviously.) He simply did distinguish individuals from group. Can't argue that he didn't.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.