I didn't get that Damore's point was to "not judge individuals as groups". Seemed the opposite.
I don't see much point in asking if people really mean what they say in the arguments they make. Address the argument.
-
-
1/Sometimes.Other times it matters.Maybe not here but at times we must address intentional obscurantism as it is. Otherwise you must discuss
-
It could be dishonesty but its hardly obscure to say 'Differences exist but there's an overlap & treating people as individuals is key.'
-
This is the perfectly standard stance of the liberal who has read a bit of evolutionary psychology. See Steven Pinker.pic.twitter.com/iIr45dWlu3
-
Would've thought that fairly obvious and unnecessary.
-
Even after the last few days?!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Does Trump intent to start a hot war with North Korea? The literal interpretation is yes. Should we take him literally? Always?
-
no, what nonsense is that, you'll be horrified by the rethoric used during the cold war, read the communications during october 1962 and see
-
My point exactly. Literal interpretations are usually myopic. There's always a reason why someone said what they said.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.