Then its very hard to understand why you'd support the firing of someone for not adhering to a biased cultural constructivist view.
-
-
I wasn't aware that Sundar Pichai was a biased cultural constructivist. But with a Wharton MBA, maybe that's the norm.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don't know what you are talking about.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Pichai fired him for failing to adhere to the Code of Conduct, as interpreted by Pichai.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sounds like the code is redundant. He should just say he'll fire anyone he disagrees with because reasons.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Nothing insane about that, is there? Which brings us back to where I came in.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes of course there is. That is completely insane. People shouldn’t be sacked for politely expressing different opinions than their boss.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Even if their opinions are opposed to company policy? No (sane) shrink would diagnose insanity in such a case.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It is insane (in a common sense of unreasonable & bizarre rather than a clinical diagnosis) to have such a policy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Donoghue_K and
Was my mother reasonable to object to her employer's policy - the Lloyd's bank - of not allowing women to take accountancy exams?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If she had been fired, would a reasonable public response to that be to misrepresent her argument & vilify her or to critique the injustice?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.