I didn’t see anything in his behaviour that breached the code of conduct and the CEO failed to mention which part of the memo did so.
-
-
The bit I've just cited is a clear breach.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Just questioning the efficacy of affirmative action is a clear breach of the code of conduct? It is a sackable offence merely to discuss it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don't think the guy was doing his utmost to create a workplace culture that is free of bias -- that's what the Code calls for.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I think he *was* trying to improve the workplace culture. I disagree with his view but disagreeing with the boss shouldn’t get you sacked.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Depends how you do it. A private memo saying "I think you're doing it wrong boss" shouldn't get him fired. That's not the route he took.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Why private when other people are criticising Google on diversity in forums?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Within the company you mean? Any company allows some criticism, that's healthy. Did anyone go as far as Damore?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don't see why 'Biological differences exist but huge overlap exists & people should be treated as individuals' is far whilst 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Donoghue_K and
'No biological differences exist & imbalance is discrimination & courses on microaggressions & bias are great' is perfectly reasonable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If u say one view can be expressed but not other, u're saying 'ppl I disagree with shld be punished even if they advocate equal opportunity'
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.