It is significant that the people who get most angry with me are people whom I agree with on goals but disagree with on approach.
-
-
They must know on some level that this is not true. They wouldn't throw the accusations at me if it were. They're meant to sting.
-
There is no intention to show me why I am wrong in my ideas, just misrepresent them as something awful so I feel afraid to talk about them.
-
I have much more respect for people who think my approach is wrong but acknowledge that we share the same goals.
-
Even if they advocate the illiberal, identitarian, culturally relative,systems of privilege, sins of the fathers approach I'm so worried abt
-
we can have a conversation if we both think that the other is well-intentioned & sincere but getting the approach horribly wrong.
-
Conversation yesterday about what makes an 'SJW' & I really think a key component is the former misrepresenting, attacking attitude.
-
That's what makes the 'warrior.' This kind of behaviour is found on the extremes of the other side as well. Its a characteristic of zealots.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.