This is more or less the majority opinion of sex researchers from what I can see...https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/no-the-google-manifesto-isnt-sexist-or-anti-diversity-its-science/article35903359/ …
-
-
Replying to @jessesingal @jaketapper
yet no consideration to the emotional/societal context of passively-aggressively making a whole gender feel threatened at the workplace?
15 replies 1 retweet 38 likes -
Why would a whole gender feel threatened at work? Please don't pretend only men accept the consensus of the behavioural sciences.
3 replies 10 retweets 149 likes -
bc it creates a bad environment when u tell a gender that they can’t do things well at a place where they get paid to do those exact things.
11 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
And it doesn't say that. Stop pretending it does so it's easier to attack it. Fewer women like STEM. Obv the ones in it do.
3 replies 5 retweets 176 likes -
if we don’t try to make things more diverse at work, they won’t get that way. workplace diversity is hard, but it’s worth it.
20 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Why? Why can't we do what we want? Why do women have to want to do what men want to do in the same numbers?pic.twitter.com/GnozsGrCeO
18 replies 70 retweets 299 likes -
because i can tell you that having as many perspectives represented as possible makes for a more inspiring environment and a better business
12 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
I agree. That's why it was great when someone brought a biological perspective into the conversation. He got fired. Back to one perspective.
6 replies 7 retweets 182 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @ischafer and
If biology is most important perspective, why does Google ask where ppl got degrees etc instead of just looking btw their legs at interview?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
It's not the most important perspective? People's qualifications are?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.