3/n...have inflexible hours. In Russia, it seems women are more involved as physicians, but it's not particularly lucrative to do so...
-
-
4/n https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4235590/ … (so this part is cultural at least). But there's a feedback question involved.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
5/n If, in U.S.,coders were seen as low-level & those good at empathy/working with people were managing, would men distribute differently?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
6/n it seems the bio-social interface is extremely complicated. The google doc a bit 'simple' (technically speaking) in this respect.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
7/n in STEM, I still think cultural playing field has not been leveled out sufficiently, & suspect bio interest expression should be small
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
8/ there's a lot of discussion in our field at every level of the hierarchy- biases in selling STEM to children,harassment in male-dominated
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
9/n professions (which isn't symmetric with female-on-male harassment in female dominated ones), tenure track demands, etc. These still real
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
10/n the bigger part I agree with is we need a more robust model for navigating these discussions. Intellectual humility is one ingredient..
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
11/n as a climate scientist, we tell people all the time to trust experts, to consider robustness and assessments rather than indiv studies
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
12/n yet evo-psych,socios, etc are telling us it's a mix & very complicated,but everyone is becoming an overnight pop-evo/psyc/gender expert
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I don't think everyone is but agree we should be very sceptical of people who do.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.