I agree with the principle, but it is not required, that is a matter of ethics, of which Google is unsavory at best.
-
-
Replying to @_Kabaiel_
No, its not. U can argue that protecting people from ideas is more important than allowing free speech. Or simply have a 'no politics' rulepic.twitter.com/e3LQMnzEjf
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
You can do a lot of whatever you want as a company or individual, just like people can choose not to buy what you have to say or befriend u.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Kabaiel_
Yes. We have been here. This is a different issue. The right to do something is different to whether doing it is right.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Given an audience and knowledge of them I would clarify when using the term Freedom of Religion as to whether I speak to A or precept.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_Kabaiel_
Koka...I am warning you... *finger hovers over photo button* ;-)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I haven't said anything in a while! Except I'm sorry. Don't do it! Twitter screws up times of posts!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.