Vague generalizations from non-scientists who read a paper and think it supports a reactionary change to their workplace shouldn't be. 2/2
I am also someone who is unemployable in my area of expertise because of holding & writing about gender difference. This is unjust.
-
-
Agree he's being misrepresented. Still think what he said greatly overreaches the science in a way that crosses professional lines.
-
What, exactly?
-
Like, what part of what he said?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What space is owed people of x political lean in y environment. Not sure what I think. No obvious solution.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
No. It may not be your language, but insisting people drop their terms and use yours is a power play that doesn't have to be entertained.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Adults listen to people who speak differently for them and look for shared meaning, they don't refuse to listen until their demands are met.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Noted and done.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can't speak to your personal experience, but it does connect to what I thought was the most troubling/fair part of his piece--
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.