But his is a very mainstream view. Not something he invented. He also states explicitly that certain aspects of tech culture may also
-
-
Replying to @IonaItalia @VaelinVanGogh and
discourage women & those should be combated.
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @IonaItalia @VaelinVanGogh and
"I prefer to do x" is not the same as "I am incapable of doing y".
4 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
He argues the preference is biologically-based while providing zero compelling evidence for that claim.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
He provides evidence (though you're free not to find it compelling). He may be wrong abt the reasons behind the differences between men's &
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @IonaItalia @VaelinVanGogh and
women's preferences. Since you are an evolutionary biologist, you can examine the evidence, etc. I'm a humanities scholar. My concerns are
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @IonaItalia @VaelinVanGogh and
these: his free speech rights hv been infringed (in spirit though not in letter). Companies shd let employees discuss working conditions
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @IonaItalia @VaelinVanGogh and
w/out fear of punishment for their honesty. And 2ndly, ppl unable or unwilling to read critically and therefore misrepresenting the memo,
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @IonaItalia @VaelinVanGogh and
as you yourself did at the beginning of this convo & 4 which you hv yet to apologise. Lying abt what someone said is wrong. Even when you
3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
I don't accept that premise without extremely strong evidence, given the proven impact of social convention on female job preference.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The proven impact is when women are given most choice, they are least likely to choose STEM & go for jobs which call on social/verbal skills
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.