Also, who on earth is saying observed imbalances are caused *solely* by different genetic traits?
-
-
-
Seems like a sort of 'motte and bailey' ploy. Bailey: No group genetic differences exist. Motte: Imbalances aren't caused solely by them.
-
I'm saying that the default position that all imbalances are natural isn't defensible. I'm agnostic to what the optimal balance actually is.
-
But it isn't a 'default position'. It is a position that is argued for according to evidence.
-
Am I missing something or are you claiming that the imbalances we observe are, in fact natural?
-
Very many of them seem to be, yes. Men are drawn to psychology way less than women. No sign that discrimination holds them back.
-
I'm not sure why it makes much difference in terms of whether or not we should treat people as individuals anyway. We should either way.
-
Of course we should. Even if the differences were much more profound & almost no men interested in psychology, support ones who are.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.