Presumably. Not sure talking abt religious objections tho. More 'take responsibility for your own mistakes' 1/2
-
-
But this does only seem to apply to sex mistakes. No comparable resistance to paying for other people's obesity-related treatments.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @natehanco
Some sex mistakes. Is anybody saying STDs shouldn't be covered except total wingnut fire and brimstone types?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Maxtropolitan @HPluckrose
The only objection I have is govt $ for abortions outside of a hospital. IMO, we reach the extremists when we talk abt legal access.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natehanco @Maxtropolitan
I'm not sure what you mean by inside and outside of hospitals.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @natehanco
Me neither. Seems to be vaguely implying life-saving necessity. But I'm not sure.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Maxtropolitan @HPluckrose
Not necessarily life saving but generally yeah that or a serious condition with the developing child.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natehanco @HPluckrose
Another thing most Christofascists also don't deem "necessity" is a threat to the health(but not life) or future fertility of the mother.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Maxtropolitan @HPluckrose
I disagree with them. Here's the bottom line: I want the abortion decision itself to not involve the government.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natehanco @HPluckrose
If the government doesn't fund it, the government becomes inherently involved in biasing poorer women's decisions towards not doing it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, people who can't afford an abortion certainly can't afford a child.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.