Only to the extent that opposite sex marriage & other healthcare is.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @natehanco
Well, as far as I am concerned.Some lefties might want same SSM to be free &abortion but not treatment of obesity-related conditions covered
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Personally, I don't think govt should pay $ for abortions outside of a hospital. But I think it should be legal. I dunno where that puts me.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natehanco
I don't either. You're American so nationalised healthcare is new to you but has always existed for me. Opinions vary widely here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @natehanco
What else shouldn't the government pay for based on the religious objections of some citizens? Vasectomies? Oral contraceptives?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Maxtropolitan @natehanco
Presumably. Not sure talking abt religious objections tho. More 'take responsibility for your own mistakes' 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But this does only seem to apply to sex mistakes. No comparable resistance to paying for other people's obesity-related treatments.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @natehanco
Some sex mistakes. Is anybody saying STDs shouldn't be covered except total wingnut fire and brimstone types?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Maxtropolitan @natehanco
Many people are against paying for other people's healthcare generally so yes, I expect they are.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @natehanco
I'm more wondering if this objection, in the UK, is on the same level of volume and popularity as the objections to abortion coverage.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Its a different conservative issue.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.