Richard Dawkins says the options are monotheism or believing in a world that is harsh, selfish and without meaning?pic.twitter.com/eTSGqBjOhY
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Richard Dawkins says the options are monotheism or believing in a world that is harsh, selfish and without meaning?pic.twitter.com/eTSGqBjOhY
Dawkins inspires a rationalisation of ruthless exploitation of the weakest & poorest in society? Watch from 5.40. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybhZ6PLUYwI&t=345s …pic.twitter.com/IgAlDa4q2K
If you are going to write a hitpiece on someone, it does help to have paid at least minimal attention to what they think & say repeatedly.
More generally, there is a persistent arrogance in thinking other people's lives must be meaningless if they don't find meaning where you do
Well, in his defense, Dawkins IS staggeringly vapid in both philosophy & history.
Dawkins addresses philosophy?
It had a real whiff of nutty new-ageism about it. Like, stylistically, it read like a spiritualist rant
Fractally fucking wrong. Obv working backward from a conclusion with no knowledge of bio. C ungrad level philosophy. Embarrassing is spot on
He should try publish it on Nature or Science to show that genes are not selfish.
The only positive thing is that they do think he's got quite a lot of influence. Reckon he's a member of the Illuminati? 

I half recognise his summary of "The Selfish Gene", but the other half of Dawkins' explanation seems to have been missed.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.