This doesn’t even take into account Dawkins’ misogynistic anti-feminist Tweets, which is another can of worms entirely.
-
-
You two better go read about freedom of speech immediately.
3 replies 1 retweet 91 likes -
Freedom of speech ≠ Obligation to give a platform for speech. I suspect I understand free speech better than you do.
12 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @zihinselorgazm and
No, but when ppl want to hear something & have paid to do so, you should not deprive them of their right to listen.
6 replies 2 retweets 70 likes -
Replying to @IonaItalia @gorskon and
The rights of KPFA to choose who represents them should not be deprived. Dawkins hasn't been silenced by the govt. Just a concerned sponsor.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NSMike1 @IonaItalia and
This is not about depriving KPFA of their rights. It’s about telling
@kpfa that they are wrong in their assessment of@RichardDawkins1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @pthomsen @IonaItalia and
I don't think they care if they're right or wrong, they don't want their name next to those kinds of comments.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
And that is grounds for criticism just as it would be if they didn't want their name associated with any other criticism of awful ideas.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
It just adds tp the difficulty of talking honestly about the problems in Islam and fuels the far-right.pic.twitter.com/BvOMni2OdN
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.