Also ppl who use standard definition- 'prejudice on grounds of [any] race' usually do so deliberately, not coz haven't read enough sociologyhttps://twitter.com/OlivierLambert/status/887987684337209345 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
That is what they are objecting to, on principle. The idea that it's acceptable to evaluate individual worth on immutable characteristics.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
They may or may not know of critical race theory definitions which looks at the issue in terms of systems of power & privilege.
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Even if you think they should look at it this way (and I'd argue 'no' partly coz it leads to justifying some prejudice on grounds of race)
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
it's evasive to respond that they're using a word wrongly by using it in its commonly accepted way rather than addressing the objection.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
You can't stop ppl objecting to prejudice on the grounds of race by trying to take away the words they use to do that & avoiding the issue
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
Even if you do it in caplocks.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.