Yeah, but a lot of this stuff is unscientific crap put about by activist scholars. Doesn't really hold up. (Sorry to be blunt.)
-
-
Replying to @christianjbdev @kpanyc
Also, this is pretty disparaging to whole fields and whole groups of people. Are you suggesting that one cannot be both activist & scholar?
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
One can but its essential to make every effort to keep ideology out of scholarship & that isn't happening in certain fields right now.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
It's never happened, at any time, but that's the point of pushback through peer review & peer criticism. Not criticism from ignorance.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Um, I really hope you're not calling my friend ignorant.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think she's suggesting that you're talking about fields in which you don't have training.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Helen may not come from this field, but she has published pieces on some of these topics which have been admired/shared by serious thinkers.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @christianjbdev @joshua_r_eyler and
It is possible to intelligently criticise a field from without, and Helen is a very smart skeptical writer who is well up to that task.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Well, thank you! But is there a specific subject under discussion? I thought we were talking about discourses around diversity?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @christianjbdev and
Which can obviously be approached from a range of academic, political, philosophical perspectives by people in all walks of life.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It would be ironic if only academics within certain fields of sociology could have opinions on current discourses around diversity!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.