This rings true to me. Diversity may be a good thing, but endlessly singing its virtues may be a terrible mistake. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/07/the-democrats-immigration-mistake/528678/ …pic.twitter.com/vUrjbip5LN
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
It's never happened, at any time, but that's the point of pushback through peer review & peer criticism. Not criticism from ignorance.
Um, I really hope you're not calling my friend ignorant.
I think she's suggesting that you're talking about fields in which you don't have training.
Helen may not come from this field, but she has published pieces on some of these topics which have been admired/shared by serious thinkers.
It is possible to intelligently criticise a field from without, and Helen is a very smart skeptical writer who is well up to that task.
Well, thank you! But is there a specific subject under discussion? I thought we were talking about discourses around diversity?
That's where it began, yes. I also complained about activist sociological research on bias.
Well, yes. Jon Haidt has been particularly good on this. I'm currently collecting experiences of dissident sociologists on it for an essay.
Since we're using anec-data in this debate, I'll just say that I disagree. I also think it's unreasonable to make such blanket claims.
Do you disagree that ideology should be kept out of scholarship or that there has been a significant failure to do this?
I disagree that there has been a universal failure to do so.
Well, no. I try very hard to do so. But I do get penalised for this.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.