Yes but even so, that merely makes them "moral" to you.
-
-
Replying to @almdean @HPluckrose
There's a quote 'Making things better never means better for everyone, but worse for some'. Sorry for interjecting, just wanted to say that
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Of course. People who currently benefit from unfair advantages lose them if we level the playing field.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @almdean
'The first will be last and last shall be first?' It's certainly not a new concept.. a cyclical progression like that suggests a repetition
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No. That idea of a reversal goes along with the postmodern idea of reversing hierarchies & does not level the playing field.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Universal liberalism is about levelling. Eg when women began to be able to access professional qualifications as well as men.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This meant men had more competition & some of them wouldn't make the cut & would be unemployed. But they still had equal access.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @almdean
At times this produces an adverse effect, lowering the standard. As we saw with the 'no child left behind' policy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Why would adding women to the mix and allowing employers to select the best qualified lower the standard? More brains to choose from.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @almdean
Some jobs require more strength then brains. That's not my point I'm not bringing feminist ideology into question just providing an example
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Then more men will get them.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.