I'm not a big pomo, but it seems that many ideologues find moral relativism scary because it puts closely-held values into question.
-
-
And I have an individualistic take & so often agree with different people on the left or the right on different things I consider 'liberal.'
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wouldn't argue for ignoring moral implications in general; just they can't be truly universal by application.
-
I can apply them universally. I can't make others do that.
-
Yes but even so, that merely makes them "moral" to you.
-
There's a quote 'Making things better never means better for everyone, but worse for some'. Sorry for interjecting, just wanted to say that

-
Of course. People who currently benefit from unfair advantages lose them if we level the playing field.
-
'The first will be last and last shall be first?' It's certainly not a new concept.. a cyclical progression like that suggests a repetition
-
No. That idea of a reversal goes along with the postmodern idea of reversing hierarchies & does not level the playing field.
-
Universal liberalism is about levelling. Eg when women began to be able to access professional qualifications as well as men.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.