History can't be simply about pointing out how problematic everyone used to be in obscure language according to 20th century theories.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Modern scholars first took a morally superior attitudes to medieval history - look how primitive & ignorant people were.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
But this gave way to an expectation that we'd take history on its own terms & uncover its complexities & richness, not moralise about it,
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I feel like you've missed the bigger point in this article.
@JonathanHsy sums it up pretty well...pic.twitter.com/0RGzEJe0W4
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MuzaffarBhatti @JonathanHsy
If they did, that's a problem. No evidence given of it. It doesn't justify the claims made about medieval studies that I addressed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @JonathanHsy
Isn't the lack of diversity evidence in itself? And re the claims I think you've still missed the point... (1)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Medieval history is not the same as European medieval history. It's the former that should be encouraged more, no? (2)
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MuzaffarBhatti @JonathanHsy
Of course, other histories from the same period can & should be studied. I can't support bringing critical theory into medieval studies.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @JonathanHsy
Yep, and I think that is the bigger picture here! I disagree but respect that you can't support critical theory + medieval studies
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I will certainly oppose any attempt to limit what can be studied in the period. I don't think its happening tho.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.