I'm not a big pomo, but it seems that many ideologues find moral relativism scary because it puts closely-held values into question.
Its not scary. It's unethical. We need to apply liberal principles consistently or we have no liberal principles.
-
-
I don't disagree that some liberal principles can be universally applied, but when values differ, many argue "ours" are the correct ones.
-
This is always the fear. Detmer addresses it in Challenging Postmodernism.pic.twitter.com/Th7UC970ux
-
In fact, whether or not values are good or bad should not be dependent on whether they are our own or not. Consistent principles needed.
-
I'll give a read; agreed completely. We tend to see our own values as paramount, so I've always been skeptical of moral objectivist claims
-
I must argue for universal liberalism & if an argument for a different approach is better for overall human wellbeing, I'll change my mind.
-
And I have an individualistic take & so often agree with different people on the left or the right on different things I consider 'liberal.'
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.