frankly if you're happy to break a romantic relationship based on genitals you shouldn't be dating anyone
-
-
Replying to @photonicDog
But many people want their romantic relationships to also be sexual ones. Then its essential to be attracted to your partner's genitals!
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
light-cario ⚔️ Retweeted light-cario ⚔️
yes i made a mistake by not clarifying that, here read threadhttps://twitter.com/PhotonicDog/status/885799343634223104 …
light-cario ⚔️ added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @photonicDog
OK, I understand you now, thanks. However, I disagree this too because the ideas on what constitute gender varies. Depends how you define it
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @photonicDog
It certainly isn't universally true that trans women are women & trans men are men. Its true according to one understanding of gender.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
well if we go by psychological and sociological definitions then yes, trans women are women
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @photonicDog
By some psychological and sociological definitions. This seems a little Eurocentric & liberal-leaning.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
by most, a simple search on the yale uni library backs me up uhhh eurocentric? how is it eurocentric
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @photonicDog
Because the acceptance of trans women as women doesn't dominate every analysis of society. Its mostly in western universities.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
It doesn't dominate Islamic or Hindu understanding of psychology or society, does it? How prevalent is it in Russia? North Korea?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.