Now you're twisting it again. Women have no rights. Should women have rights?Then give them rights equal to rights of men by law.The idea.
-
-
I can agree with that. Where I disagree is simply with it being a moral issue. I look at both of those as pragmatic ideals. Liberal and
-
Well, if they're not arguing that men & women *should* have specific roles but only that those roles work for them, not what I'm criticising
-
I think that's what most conservatives argue. The only conflict comes when both sides have interests that completely conflict. If feminism
-
Were as simple as opting in or opting out of the movement and it not impacting individuals, there would be 0 conflict. They'd go about their
-
Roles and feminists would go about theirs. But like most situations, it's more nuanced unfortunately
-
It's the authoritarians on both sides who are the problem. To me, liberalism is about protecting the rights of ppl to live as they wish.
-
Couldn't have said it better.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.