Exactly what I meant,used and abused.It shouldn't even have a 'name'..But it's not right to aid that by accepting it into the same ideology.
-
-
That's the thing.They aren't criticising feminisim.They criticise something else that they insist on calling feminism.It's counterproductive
-
It's not the critics that insist on calling it feminism.
-
Consider this my criticism for jumping on the bandwagon. It shouldn't be called the same, if it's something else. It's counterproductive.
-
We might have different aims. You seem to want to defend the reputation of feminism. I want to show the problems with current manifestation.
-
It would be counterproductive for you to call the current lunacy 'feminism' but essential for me to address the current lunacy.
-
Then you mustn't call it feminism,if it isn't.Debunk the name first,so feminists can keep an ideology without forcing them to relate to that
-
I'm not interested in helping feminists keep an ideology. I'm interested in addressing what feminism has become,
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.