Women generally realise men en masse are not defined by individual lunatics! You cld doubt this if you listen to too many feminists.https://twitter.com/rhodeislander/status/885653021685944325 …
Yes, but it was me saying 'too many' feminists coz I don't think feminism is defined by equality & equal rights.
-
-
I'd respectfully disagree. It's not feminism if gender equality isn't the focus; the ideology is hijacked, misused, used or abused, imo.
-
Sure. By 'feminism', you're referring to the aim for gender equality. I'm talking about the movement & it's activists.I put it this way:pic.twitter.com/NQX3EPKkNi
-
Exactly what I meant,used and abused.It shouldn't even have a 'name'..But it's not right to aid that by accepting it into the same ideology.
-
I think we need to accept that the concept has shifted. Pretending it hasn't & feminism is still the aim for equal rights won't work.pic.twitter.com/gS7ctggbcO
-
I'd rather not. I think it deserves differentiating.The very least by radical, extreme..etc.Feminism has nothing to do with any of that txt.
-
OK, but you must understand that when people speak of 'feminism' they usually are talking abt the current manifestation not gender equality
-
& current feminism *does* come from women's perspective, it *is* dominated by claims of patriarchy & culturally constructed gender.
-
It does produce a lot of nonsense abt mansplaining & cultural appropriation & wage gaps etc. This is what ppl associate with feminism.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.