That's a different thing again. Nothing to do with diversity of ideas or ability to have a conversation. I suspect that's not whole reason.
But if someone influential within liberal/sceptical circles would be way more worth answering. Coz they are a much bigger deal.
-
-
Also, there's big & there's big. Eli isn't that well known. I didn't know him. Fewer ppl know me but that's no measure of what is big!
-
Because I'm not big...my show isn't big...James has no idea who I am. Yet he responded to me, shared my tweet but ignored Eli
-
Exactly. There's no grounds to accuse him of ignoring people coz not influential. Eli gets ignored for other reasons.
-
I'm not accusing. Those are words right from James' own tweet. No accusation needed. You might ignore for other reasons but not James
-
He did *not* say that he wouldn't discuss coz not big. He said he didn't bother muting him coz he wasnt
-
In regards to people attempting conversation with him about a paper he asked for a review on. Full context of the discussion matters
-
It doesn't change what was responded to. I can't suggest anything else that getting over someone changing mind about talking to you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.