This is really an embarrassingly small way to behave. Engage with ideas different than your own or end up in your little echo chamber
-
-
I take your point, but disagree in that he's not basing his refusal to speak with him in the content of his ideas; rather not being "big"
-
That's a different thing again. Nothing to do with diversity of ideas or ability to have a conversation. I suspect that's not whole reason.
-
Again, fair point. But given the incredible reach
@elibosnick actually does have, I suspect that this is disingenuous reasoning. -
I don't think 'reach' is the reason, no. Don't think it was suggested it was. Reason not to bother muting rather than not to bother talking.
-
If reach isn't the reason, or wasn't suggested. What is meant by the phrase "He's not big"?
-
It was given as the reason for not needing to mute.
-
Given as the reason for not needing to mute. Because he isn't big. But this isn't about reach? What other way is that phrase meant? Height?
-
Big can certainly mean reach & it might do here. I'm not a mind-reader. I'm pointing out its given as a reason for not needing to mute.
- 21 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.