Hanlons razor says "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity". I'd suggest a variation on it.
-
-
Assuming dishonesty wrongly loses an opportunity to change minds. Assuming sincerity wrongly wastes only a little time. Gullibility>cynicism
-
In the same way, I would draw a careful distinction between hypocrisy & inconsistency. The first is knowing, the second might not be.
-
This might be a semantic quibble but I know I'd respond more positively to being told I'm being inconsistent than being told I'm a hypocrite
-
Because I know I'm not a hypocrite. I absolutely think I am being consistent. I also know I have been mistaken about that at times.
-
If you'd speak with
@SamHarrisOrg on his podcast, what would you think to be the most likely ideas of disagreement? -
I keep thinking I disagree with Sam Harris but on reading his rationale, I find I don't. Guns, maybe?
-
What made you bring him up? Do you disagree with him on many issues?
-
I find you both very well articulated and thoughtful, which made me wonder about whether your viewpoints would align on all kinds of topics
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Why the term "dogwhistle" frustrates me so much. People usually mean exactly the words they use. Why muddy communications with assumptions?
-
Strike that, change "usually" to "often". Did I just discredit my own point?
-
XD I think the assumption that people mean what they say is a good general rule.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.