Yes. What is behind this? Is it a denial of the existence of problems on the other side? In that case, you are the other side. https://twitter.com/uncleJim70/status/884747750058930177 …
-
-
In same way, if Christians spend more time criticising Christians with different ideas than Muslims, doesn't mean they think Islam is right.
-
The whole conversation abt what the proper Christian attitude towards is is based on a belief that a Christian approach is the right one.
-
In same way, if someone asks me why I spend more time criticising SocJus ideas than Nazism,its coz the problem with Nazism is bloody obvious
-
If I need to explain to you why genocidal antisemitism, racism & homophobia is wrong, you're already likely to be a lost cause.
-
Whereas if you think IdPol, promotion of diversity of identity & restrictions on diversity of ideas is the way to achieve equality...
-
...We do at least share the aim for equal rights & opposition to racism/sexism etc. Its worth arguing why I think ur going abt it wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Acknowledging the issues on the other side now & then even if it's obvious goes a long way to maintain credibility.
-
Yes. Even if its just to remind people 'This is the alternative if we don't get our act in gear & be a party reasonable ppl will vote for'
-
But ideally not just that. Even if pointing out that racism is bad seems too obvious, we can point out racism & deplore it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.