I don't know. In general, I'd go with as little banning as possible of things people do that impacts only themselves (so ban sex-slavery)https://twitter.com/Dragonblaze/status/883808645846364160 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I see encouraging harmful practices as worth banning. This includes anti-vaxxers and charlatans selling worthless remedies.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Dragonblaze @HPluckrose
Also, not everyone is a competent adult, there are vulnerable people. How would your extreme liberalism even begin to protect them?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @CdnAck @Dragonblaze
Missed this. We cannot make all ideas appropriate for vulnerable people.Those who are not competent adults will require monitoring or advice
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
To ensure they do not enter sex-work, wear burqas or take drugs without understanding what these entail. Can't ban them for everyone.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @CdnAck
Sex trafficking is never voluntary. It's tricking someone with a job offer in a different country and then forcing them into prostitution.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Dragonblaze @CdnAck
Of course it isn't. How did we get here?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @CdnAck
Just defining the difference between sex trafficking and sex work. Only the latter can be voluntary.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Thanks for telling me. O_o
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
