I don't know. In general, I'd go with as little banning as possible of things people do that impacts only themselves (so ban sex-slavery)https://twitter.com/Dragonblaze/status/883808645846364160 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I see encouraging harmful practices as worth banning. This includes anti-vaxxers and charlatans selling worthless remedies.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Dragonblaze @HPluckrose
Also, not everyone is a competent adult, there are vulnerable people. How would your extreme liberalism even begin to protect them?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @CdnAck @Dragonblaze
Missed this. We cannot make all ideas appropriate for vulnerable people.Those who are not competent adults will require monitoring or advice
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
To ensure they do not enter sex-work, wear burqas or take drugs without understanding what these entail. Can't ban them for everyone.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Dragonblaze
Who decides? Slippery slope even though it seems so obvious instinctively
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CdnAck @Dragonblaze
Otherwise you can make your own choices re sex-work, drugs or burqas. Or ask for guidance.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Dragonblaze
It's those who don't know how or when to ask for guidance that will need it the most
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, obviously but the point is not whether people through the gaps of social care systems but whether we shld ban stuff.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
