Disputing a scientific study with anecdotal evidence, eh? It said 'disproportionately' not 'overwhelmingly'. Top 20 isn't anywhere near 1%
-
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @_joemo
Significant anecdotally or significant scientifically? I doubt 20 people is scientifically significant to 1% of Twitter
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Fisher_Download @_joemo
It's interesting. The most popular Twitter accounts are diverse in terms of gender and race.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @_joemo
If you want to dispute the study there's loads of approaches but just saying the top 20 users are diverse seems to misunderstand it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Fisher_Download @_joemo
I don't think it matters that much. It was interesting. The report was heavily ideological in its claims for the cause.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @_joemo
Judging by both the report and these reactions, seems like the report was moderate and the reactions here were ideological
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Fisher_Download @_joemo
I don't see that. Report claims glass ceiling, societal inequalities reflected, men taking higher positions. Top 20 users is just that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
There hasn't been any suggestion the top 20 are diverse because ideology of race or gender. Just presented.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.