I *think* its simply that there's an ideological objection to associating penises with the masculine & vaginas with the feminine.https://twitter.com/TamaraBrouwer1/status/882685405002444800 …
-
-
Far better to set out good ethical arguments for supporting trans people than to try to police sexual attraction.
-
I think the right to personal fulfilment & expression provided you're not hurting anyone else is the strongest ethical argument for doing so
-
It doesn't really matter what u know or believe abt gender when it comes to letting ppl do their own thing & treating them as individuals.
-
There was a YouTube video going around from a female identifying trans person who insisted it's "transphobic" if a penis is a deal breaker.
-
I don't understand how that argument is compatible with the idea that sexuality is an immutable characteristic.
-
It's not. It's activism disguised as rational examination. I'm very pro trans. But I will not have sex with a person who has a penis.
-
It seems as vacuous as the claims that gay conversion therapy is effective.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
These things have been subject to automatic, mandatory association for so long, maybe it's not so bad to be reminded this is now optional?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.