Someone is arguing that attraction to secondary sexual characteristics is essential to sexual orientation but not primary sexual ones.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I have not been able to get a clear explanation of this. Does anyone else understand?
9 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
It seems likely that attraction to feminine/masculine appearance came about as a useful & fairly reliable indicator of mating potential?
4 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Even tho some people have always been gay (probably), increasing the chances of successful reproduction must be what drove it?
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
In which case, it would be very unlikely that attraction did not also respond to primary sexual characteristics?
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
But yes, no matter what the reasoning behind this, it does not justify policing other people's attractions for ideological/moral purposes.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
The 'I don't have to justify my lack of sexual interest in you' rule is a good one.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.