Someone is arguing that attraction to secondary sexual characteristics is essential to sexual orientation but not primary sexual ones.
-
-
But yes, no matter what the reasoning behind this, it does not justify policing other people's attractions for ideological/moral purposes.
-
The 'I don't have to justify my lack of sexual interest in you' rule is a good one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So many theories! "Supportive uncle" theory; cultural-innovative theory (Wilson); best in Prum's "Evo of Beauty". + fraternal birth order.
-
Sex = social glue (ie bonobos), inc same-sex pleasuring. Suspect ancestors attracted to same sex also had hetero repro sex until recently.
-
History suggests they did. Tho when we get a king, we often get hints that this was a burden.
-
James I certainly. The demands put upon a poor monarch!
-
I was thinking of him, particularly, yes. Didn't like women much either. Did you see his 'Satire on Women'. We're subhuman, apparently.
-
What a catch!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.