Someone is arguing that attraction to secondary sexual characteristics is essential to sexual orientation but not primary sexual ones.
-
-
Even tho some people have always been gay (probably), increasing the chances of successful reproduction must be what drove it?
-
In which case, it would be very unlikely that attraction did not also respond to primary sexual characteristics?
-
But yes, no matter what the reasoning behind this, it does not justify policing other people's attractions for ideological/moral purposes.
-
The 'I don't have to justify my lack of sexual interest in you' rule is a good one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's crazy talk Helen! ;-)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People are susceptible to societal conditioning about what's attractive. Particularly because a conventionally attractive mate = status.
-
But that's mostly about secondary sex characteristics, and sex-unrelated aspects of appearance that are decreed by society to be attractive.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.