It does feel very odd for me, an atheist, to be told by Christians that rights are a human concept & there's no objectively moral stance.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I agree obviously. We need to argue for the right to healthcare as a moral good. But where do they think I think those ethics come from?
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
That's the answer that needs to be articulated by proponents. What distinguishes a good policy from a right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rhoark
I am just discovering that Americans use the term 'right' in a quasi religious sense to mean something inalienable that exists objectively.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @rhoark
Whereas I am talking about 'things we decide that a good society should provide for all its citizens.'
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @rhoark
Whereas human rights are not something for society to decide. They are an ethical version of a scientific discovery.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BristolBen @rhoark
They're a human concept based on the premise that human wellbeing in this matters.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @rhoark
We'll agree that they are not Godly
.
Yes, the only thing you need to add is that they are a *necessary* and *inevitable* concept.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BristolBen @rhoark
They're good for us. It might be better for the rest of life on this planet if we murdered each other into extinction.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @rhoark
Yes. They are human-centred but adding animal life would simply imply giving them similar rights.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
And stopping a lot of technology & fossil fuel etc.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.