I'm not sure how that relates? I'm talking abt an assumption coming from feminism that men are the perfectly realised human being
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @fronxer
And that women will be equal when they start liking the same things men do in the same numbers.
1 reply 4 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @fronxer
This is most often seen when STEM is presented as better than female dominated realms like education & healthcare.
2 replies 4 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @fronxer
But also in sexuality. Women must either stop liking erotic fiction & go for visual porn more or men stop liking latter more.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
There probably are people who would argue that, but what I find more interesting is how (/why) gender-aligned preferences propagate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
Evolutionary psychology is good here? Where men & women have the most choice, they choose most differently.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @avnerarik
I don't find it paradoxical. It might be surprising to some ppl, but it would also be a mistake to claim universality
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer @avnerarik
No, that's a misnomer. Its straightforward & what you'd expect if men & women had different interests on average.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Agreed vs universality. This is what we want to avoid. Claims of fundamental differences *and* claims of no differences on average.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.